As an HL student you face 10-mark questions in two different papers: Paper 1 part (a) ("Explain") and Paper 3 part (b) ("Recommend"). The skills, assessment criteria, and structure are different for each.
This guide covers both, with full model answers split into mark-earning paragraphs so you can see exactly how top-band responses are built. For the SL-focused version (Paper 1 only), see our SL 10-Mark Economics Guide.
Paper 1 part (a) — "Explain" [10 marks]
You choose one question from three. The command term is almost always "Explain". No stimulus material is given — you must supply your own examples and diagrams.
Assessment criteria
| Marks | What examiners expect |
|---|---|
| 1–2 | Little understanding. Terms stated but not relevant. |
| 3–4 | Some understanding. Theory described but not explained. |
| 5–6 | Demands partly addressed. Theory partly explained. Diagram(s) included. |
| 7–8 | Demands understood and addressed. Theory explained. Diagram(s) included and explained. |
| 9–10 | Demands fully addressed. Theory fully explained. Diagram(s) fully explained. |
Model structure
- Define key terms (1–2 sentences)
- Explain the economic theory — cause-and-effect chain
- Draw and explain a diagram — label all axes, curves, equilibria
- Give a real-world example
- Extend the explanation — consequences or implications
Full model answer — Paper 1 style
Explain how the existence of common access resources may lead to market failure.
[10 marks]
Model answer (9–10 band)
① Define key terms
Common access resources (also called common pool resources) are resources that are rivalrous — one person's use reduces availability for others — but non-excludable, meaning no one can be prevented from using them. Examples include ocean fish stocks, forests, and clean air.
② Define the second key term
Market failure occurs when the free market fails to allocate resources efficiently, resulting in a loss of economic welfare. In this case, the market failure arises because common access resources have no defined ownership and therefore no price mechanism to signal scarcity.
③ Explain the incentive problem
Because there is no owner to charge a price, individual users have an incentive to maximise their own consumption. A fishing company will continue to increase its catch because the private marginal cost (MPC) of fishing does not include the cost imposed on other fishers or on the ecosystem.
④ Identify the externality
This creates a negative externality of production: the marginal social cost (MSC) of extracting the resource exceeds the MPC. The difference between MSC and MPC is the external cost — the damage to the ecosystem and to other users that the individual firm does not pay for.
⑤ Introduce and explain the diagram
This can be shown on the diagram below. The market produces at Qm where MPC = MSB (demand), because firms only consider their private costs. However, the socially optimal output is Qopt where MSC = MSB.

⑥ Explain the welfare loss
The resource is overconsumed by Qm − Qopt. For every unit between Qopt and Qm, the MSC exceeds the MSB. The shaded triangle represents the deadweight loss (DWL).
⑦ Real-world example
A clear example is overfishing in the North Atlantic. Cod populations in the Grand Banks collapsed to less than 1% of historical levels by the 1990s because no single entity bore the full social cost of extraction.
⑧ Explain the tragedy of the commons
This is the tragedy of the commons: each user acts rationally in self-interest, but collectively the resource is degraded or depleted.
⑨ Conclude
Therefore, common access resources lead to market failure because the absence of ownership creates a divergence between private costs and social costs, resulting in allocative inefficiency. Without government intervention (quotas, tradable permits, taxation), the resource will continue to be overused.
Paper 3 part (b) — "Recommend" [10 marks]
Paper 3 is HL only. The 10-mark question is part (b) of each data-response section. The command term is "Recommend" — you present an advisable course of action supported by the stimulus data.
Assessment criteria
| Marks | What examiners expect | What this looks like for Japan inflation question |
|---|---|---|
| 1–2 | Policy identified. No theory, no use of text/data. | "Japan should use fiscal policy" — no explanation. |
| 3–4 | Appropriate policy with limited theory. No text/data. | Explains fiscal policy shifts AD right, but doesn't reference any data from the stimulus. |
| 5–6 | Policy explained. Some theory and text/data. Unbalanced evaluation. | Explains the multiplier effect, mentions −0.1% rate, but evaluation is one-sided (only advantages). |
| 7–8 | Policy fully explained. Text/data used. Mostly balanced evaluation. | Uses liquidity trap theory, references debt (263%), savings rate (8.4%). Acknowledges limitations but conclusion is thin. |
| 9–10 | Policy fully explained with effective theory. Balanced evaluation. Justified conclusion. | All data points woven in. Multiplier + liquidity trap theory. Evaluates debt concerns, crowding out, cost of deflation. Concluding recommendation weighs trade-offs. |
Model structure
- State your recommended policy clearly
- Explain how the policy works — economic theory (AD/AS, multiplier, etc.)
- Reference the text/data — quote specific figures
- Include a diagram if it supports your argument
- Evaluate — limitations, time lags, trade-offs
- Conclude with a justified recommendation
Full model answer — Paper 3 style
Using the text/data provided and your knowledge of economics, recommend a policy that could be used in Japan to increase the rate of inflation to 2%.
[10 marks]
Stimulus (excerpt): Japan has experienced deflation or near-zero inflation for over two decades. The Bank of Japan's interest rate has been at −0.1% since 2016. Consumer spending remains weak despite low unemployment (2.6%). Household savings rates have increased to 8.4%. Government debt stands at 263% of GDP, the highest among developed economies.
Model answer (9–10 band)
① State the recommendation
I recommend that the Japanese government implements expansionary fiscal policy, specifically increased government spending on infrastructure and green energy projects, to boost aggregate demand and push inflation toward the 2% target.
② Explain how the policy works
Expansionary fiscal policy involves increasing government expenditure or cutting taxes to stimulate economic activity. When the government increases spending, this directly raises a component of aggregate demand (AD = C + I + G + X − M). The resulting rightward shift in AD increases both real GDP and the general price level — moving the economy toward the 2% inflation target.
③ Explain the multiplier effect
Moreover, government spending has a multiplier effect: each yen spent creates income for workers and suppliers, who then spend a portion of that income, generating further rounds of spending. This amplifies the initial fiscal injection.
④ Reference the text/data — why monetary policy has failed
The text states that the Bank of Japan's interest rate has been at −0.1% since 2016, yet inflation remains below target. This suggests monetary policy has been ineffective — Japan appears to be in a liquidity trap where further interest rate reductions cannot stimulate spending. Additionally, with consumer spending weak despite 2.6% unemployment and household savings rising to 8.4%, there is a confidence problem that direct government spending can address more effectively than further monetary easing.
⑤ Evaluate — limitations
However, there are significant limitations. Japan's government debt is already 263% of GDP — the highest among developed economies. Further fiscal expansion increases the debt burden and may crowd out private investment if interest rates eventually rise. There is also the risk of wasteful allocation if spending is not directed toward productive investments.
⑥ Justified conclusion
On balance, given the failure of ultra-loose monetary policy over more than two decades and the weak consumer spending, expansionary fiscal policy targeted at productivity-enhancing infrastructure is the most appropriate recommendation. The high debt level is a concern, but the cost of continued deflation — falling real wages, delayed consumption, and rising real debt burdens — is arguably greater.
Common mistakes — Paper 1 & Paper 3
- Not defining key terms: Definitions show immediate understanding — examiners cannot award top-band without them
- Describing instead of explaining: "MSC is above MPC" is description. Explaining why and what happens as a result earns marks
- Unlabelled or unexplained diagrams (Paper 1): A diagram never referenced in your text is worth very little
- Ignoring the stimulus (Paper 3): If the question says "using the text/data", you must quote specific figures. Answers using only general theory cannot score above 5–6
- No evaluation (Paper 3): For "Recommend", you must acknowledge limitations. No evaluation caps you at 5–6
- Multiple policies without comparing: Only the best policy is marked unless you explicitly show policies are complementary
Quick checklist
| Check | Paper 1 | Paper 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Key terms defined | ✓ | ✓ |
| Theory explained (not just described) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diagram drawn, labelled, and explained | ✓ | If relevant |
| Real-world example | ✓ | Use stimulus data |
| Specific data/text referenced | — | ✓ (essential) |
| Evaluation / limitations | — | ✓ (essential) |
| Justified conclusion | — | ✓ |
Practice writing IB Economics answers and receive feedback.
Practice Economics questions →For 15-mark essays, see How to Structure a 15-Mark Economics Essay. For SL students, see our SL 10-Mark Economics Guide.
Ready to put your IB knowledge to the test?
Try a full-length mock exam with real IB-style questions and instant marking — or browse our question bank to practise topic by topic.